I decided to write a piece with 3 completely random songs to challenge myself. I believe it will help me in the future when I write professionally and need to transition between movements.
Please critique this piece! Or at least some feedback (thoughts, opinions, requests) would be nice.
If you stick around for updates, expect a big run after where Moonlight Sonata left off. It will help to transition back into Hymn of Acxiom.
- The harp part is a sound effect, not an actual part to be played
- All diddled phrases are to be played as normal rolls
- I will update sticking soon
- This piece will eventually come full circle and will end with the ending of the first unoriginal piece
- I changed all the settings so the sheet music would look as close to Sibelius as possible, but they don't go through well online
- I used two soundfonts
- Hymn to Acxiom
- La Marseillaise (French National Anthem, only minor section)
- The second half of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata mvmt. 3
I'm really liking the new piano roll feature. It really visualizes scores and helps you see how it looks on a piano, and you can get a better grasp of the music if you got something like an entire band arrangement.
If there's any way that it can be more stable and in sync without having to stop and play, I'm all for it Especially when you got big and advanced scores like this one I recreated:
The first line of the score is hiding by headers, if you touch the screen to remove the heading (header) then you do not have start stop button on the screen. So, you looese the first line when playing back the song.
Omer Remzi SARI
The piano tutorial is AMAZING. Thus, we would like the option to publish that on youtube, not the old one with the score and the musescore piano on the bottom of the screen. The look is even better than Synthesia, and I think that everyone will love it when the feature is added.
How do I "write" that a sustained note (flute, linked with ties, spanning two measures) should "fade out"?
This is for a piece which I am transcribing at the moment, and this is a flute part.
In this part, 4/4 with tempo 70, I need to tell that a same sustained note (a half, then a dotted half, then an eighth, all tied) should go from mf to pp, and as you guessed, this spans two measures.
I fail to see how I can do this. I have succeeded in adding a bar line and dynamics but it won't do that on playback which probably means I am doing it wrong.
What should I do?
I confess I'm annoyed. For some time the first lines were missing. After the last update you are usually back on the first page. They are still missing on the second page. When I bought the app, everything was fine. The updates have brought the problem. When will this be solved? I like to use musecore, but that's really a problem. Please, please fix that soon.
Score previews on the following profile links are TOO BIG and take up 1+ screens, requiring multiple scrolls to see the next score
> Profile> Scores
> Sets> Specific Set
Notice for the last link, because I’ve included score info Just one score requires two or three scrolls on mobile since lyrics and score info are included. They should either be reduced significantly or just look like the “My Scores” screen — cleaner and easier to navigate on mobile (and PC imho)
It tells me that I need my password, but I don't want to go through all the trouble of trying to remember it.
I think this would be a great feature, as there are some things that I wouldn't mind sharing with certain people that I don't want everyone to have access to. Also, having it where you can send it directly from your device without having to have it online somewhere else, would be helpful.
However, I think that the user that you're sending it to needs to have the option to approve or deny you sending something, as spammers might send inappropriate pictures, etc.
As always please add feedback. Feel free to check out anything else on my profile as well. If you interact with me I will surely check you out also :).
Is there any way of seeing a smaller/plainer Play Panel which only shows the duration of the piece? The numbers were bigger in Musescore 2 and easier to read. I only use play Panel to check where I am in the duration of a piece. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
Or is it just me, the screen got smaller of Musescore.
I like it when it was big.
Say any thing u want
1) Scores with more than 5 staffs
Problem: YouTube Transfer cuts off staff 6+
2) Scores with more than 1 Lyric Verse
Problem: YouTube Transfer condenses verses and obscures all lyrics
3) scores with Staff or System Text
Problem: even if I adjust the text manually or choose automatic placement, YouTube transfer results in the staff or system text obstructing other staff elements
4) Display of multiple systems on a single YouTube frame
Problem: YouTube transfer stacks Systems on top of another system in a single Frame on YouTube, obscuring lyrics on the system displayed on the bottom
I'm trying to write a violin concerto, but the 16th notes are so quiet that I can barely hear them, even with the volume turned up. I tried changing the dynamic to Forte, and that didn't work. I also tried changed the volume of the notes, all of them to 96, and they were still too quiet.
It's a little annoying when there is a long note for a flute or another woodwind, and it sounds like a trill, rather then vibrato. Can you please add a way to turn that off, or make the vibrato 'smaller'?
I forgot to put a space after a URL I typed in a description, I put a period, so it didn't work. Will this ever be fixed? It used to work correctly before the UG takeover. Been reported countless times.
I search for an arrangement of a popular piece and I am overwhelmed with results:
- Half are just garbage or low effort attempts.
- Some are reasonable arrangements but still miss the mark
- Many are duplicates of another user's submission with slight modifications
- Finally(!), there will be 1 or 2 excellent arrangements
As the popularity of Musescore's online hub increases (this is a good thing!), there absolutely NEEDS to be a system to rate and sort content. Sorting by "Relevance" seems to return results based on views (and maybe favorite counts?) which rather arbitrarily promotes whatever submission is oldest. If it wasn't for the thumbnail pictures giving me a good visual clue of the quality of the piece, I would rarely search for sheet music on this site.
The current Favorites feature is great, but just because I like a piece or think it worthy of promotion doesn't mean I want it saved to my Profile. As a result, I use the Favorite button sparingly, as it should be. A ratings system, separate from Favorites, needs to be implemented.
A ratings system!
I see that this topic comes up periodically, and the usual discussions ensue over whether negative feedback (e.g. thumbs down, 1 star, etc) is against the spirit of the site and so on... but regardless of implementation, can we all agree that this site will soon become near unusable as a content-finding platform without some type of ratings system?