Goldberg Variations

Uploaded on May 28, 2012

This new edition of Bach's Goldberg Variations is created by MuseScore lead developer Werner Schweer. The funds to create this work raised via the crowd funding site Kickstarter (http://kck.st/opengoldberg). The edition has been refined through an open process of peer review and careful scrutiny from pianist Kimiko Ishizaka. You can listen and download her recording on http://opengoldbergvariations.org

To open the MuseScore source file, you need at least MuseScore 2 which you can download from http://musescore.org/en

Revision History
* Mar 8th 2017: Made compatible with MuseScore 2.1 by mike320 - https://musescore.com/user/6105546
* Sept 18th 2015: Made compatible with MuseScore 2.0.2
* June 16th 2012: Revised edition (20+ fixes - http://bit.ly/Kki4KL )
* May 28th 2012: Release of the score

A special thanks to:
* All the people who funded this project
* All the people who helped with the public peer review of the score

The OpenGoldberg team
Werner Schweer, Nicolas Froment, Thomas Bonte
Robert Douglass, Kimiko Ishizaka, Anne-Marie Sylvestre

Follow OpenGoldberg on
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Open.Goldberg.Variations
Twitter: https://twitter.com/opengoldberg


Pages 58
Duration 65:12
Measures 990
Key signature 1 sharp
Parts 1
Part names Piano
Privacy Everyone can see this score
License Creative Commons copyright waiver
Show moreShow less

This score appears in:

Your comment


Congratulations - lovely work. The Czerny edition and Bach facsimile have Var 25. m.21 third beat in the left hand with Cb and Gb where you have C and G naturals.

Var. 25, m.3 last note of the R.H should be tied over the bar? This is the case in the Urtext edition and the Czerny edition.

Possible typo on Variation 16, m.11 left hand last note. (p. 30 in the score)

Should be G# not Ab correct?

Die Goldberg-Variationen von Bach

Quelle: https://musescore.com/opengoldberg/goldberg-variations. Die Datei läßt mit dem Online-Player abspielen, (der aber Kunstpausen macht) herunterladen und läßt sich auf lokaler Festplatte speichern... Die Datei läßt sich auch als ".PDF" -Notenblatt herunterladen - aber auch dieses zeigt Fehler...

Was kann man gegen den Fehler tun? Zwar habe ich in der Beschreibung unter den Noten gelesen...

>> To open the MuseScore source file, you need to use the MuseScore nightly build which you can download from http://musescore.org/en/download#nightly<&lt;

Wirklich??? Eine alte MuseScore - Beta-Version von 2014 laden und installieren, wo ich grade das Update auf die allerneueste Vers. 2.02 von 2015 zum Laufen gebracht habe???

Vielleicht könnte sich doch mal einer der ursprünglichen Editoren um Behebung der Fehler bemühen, bzw. Frage: Was stünde einer neuen Revision/Update dieser Datei entgegen?



In reply to by Thomas

I recommend: Take a look at https://musescore.com/user/28092/scores/1221071
Classical Music on harp or guitar might not be your choice... but, the technique of enhancing a thin, "dry" default General-MIDI-Soundfont FluidR3Mono_GM.sf3 to an enhanced, "wet" variant, might be of interest to many kinds of instrument and many music styles.
IMHO: With a little sound mixing effort, "FluidR3Mono_GM.sf3" could be polished and proove as a real good sounding Instrument!
Let me know, what you think.
Have fun, and: Set the music free!

Opening this in the newly-released MuseScore 2.0 gives a "score corrupted" error:

Measure 813 Staff 1 incomplete. Expected: 3/4; Found: 54/32
Measure 814 Staff 1 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 54/32
Measure 814 Staff 2 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 6/8
Measure 815 Staff 1 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 54/32
Measure 815 Staff 2 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 6/8
Measure 816 Staff 1 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 54/32
Measure 816 Staff 2 incomplete. Expected: 9/8; Found: 12/16
... and so on

Perhaps it's only supposed to be opened by the nightly build?

Where's the videoscore with Mr. Glenn Gould playing? Just kidding, unless someone wants to do the 58 pages. The 5 greatest sets of piano variations:
Bach: Goldberg Variations
Beethoven: Diabelli variations
Rachmaninoff: Rhapsody on a theme by Paganini
Sorabji: Dies Irae cycle
Rzewski: The People United will never be Defeated.

The introspective Aria needs more time to let the gorgeous twists and turns of the ornamentation sink in. In other words, the tempo is a little too hurried. The playback execution of the ornaments has improved at the very beginning: it needs to be carried out throughout the score. It must take an enormous amount of time & effort to write these out for playback, so I hope that eventually a flexible parameterized ornamentation playback will catch up to the ornamentation engraving capability and reduce that work. Figuring out what the parameters are for such ornamentation will be a major challenge. Thanks for all your effort!

Sweet! Excellent work. A couple of comments:
The repeats should occur without any pause. Playing it with the latest nightly build I get a pause of a few seconds, about what one would expect between movements.
The ornamentation is not quite there yet, and it doesn't reproduce Ishizaka's performance. I guess that's the purpose of the exercise, and I assume it's still being polished.

In reply to by skaufman

The ornaments playback in MuseScore is still being worked on, so that's right, it needs to be polished. Our mantra when developing MuseScore has always been notation first, playback after. So by taking on the Goldberg Variations we wanted to improve the MuseScore typesetting quality first. Concerning the pause with the repeats, I need to verify with Werner who made the score. Will get back to you with the answer.

Is the MusicXML conversion supposed to be working properly? I imported the MusicXML version of the score into FinaleReader and the a repeat in the first variation brought be back into the opening aria.

Is anyone having problems opening file in musescore? I doesn't open, not even shows any error :s

In reply to by sunno

Hello folks. Sorry to return to this issue. Why is not possible to open the file using the stable version? I think is important to keep the compatibility. The mscz file should not be different, no matter on which version of MuseScore it was written. What do the developers say about that?

es mucho mejor que no tenga ninguna indicación de digitación. Ayuda mucho más al estudiante poner con un lápiz sus propias digitaciones, ya que las digitaciones NO son universales.
Además es de mejor calidad que sea lo más fiel a la partitura original que seguramente no trae ninguna digitación.
Gracias por el trabajo! y apoyen el proyecto!

Please PLEASE do NOT add any finger suggestions. It makes it very awful to overwrite those with paint or thick pencils. There always remain irritating numbers on the sheet. Please think of 2-dimension-instruments as Bayan accordion completely and the piano accordion half side is (left part). I play a couple of the goldberg variations and the fingering ist much more dense than a 1.5-dimension-instrument ever could be. On the other (left) hand i only habe four fingers. (C-c is not 1-5 but 2-5 on both sides of the instrument, cdefgahc is not 12312345 but as example 32323423, [could also be 12323421 on right side] and it also differs from the construction, the basic grip-system C, B,...
Where a 1.5-instrument has 1, 2 or three fingering variations i have always a couple of equal good fingerings and the trick is to find the best what may also vary from player to player.
Therefore for accordion any printed fingering for "piano"-like makes no sense.

In reply to by husar2003

I agree -- fingering suggestions shouldn't be added to the source. Someone who wanted to add suggestions should be able to publish a separate layer that can be used to supplement the score. I don't know whether MuseScore can support such functionality.

I'd guess that the fingering suggestions can be layered on top of the existing score instead of being added directly to the score. Of course, we'd need someone to offer such suggestions!

Have you considered adding fingering suggestions? It would make the score a lot more helpful for students.

In reply to by cayblood

My opinion is that you should figure out the fingering that works best for you. Not all hands are the same. I use my fourth or ring finger in lieu of my little finger on many occasions. On other occasions depending on the run, I must start with the little finger. In one instance in the Aria I play what is written for the left hand with my right hand. Another issue is this was originally intended to played on the harpsichord which may have had more than one manual. Sometimes two notes are indicated when only one can be played. In the end you have to figure out how you are are going to develop you own personal interpretation. I takes time, and much thought. Listen to versions you like is helpful, but in the end you must arrive at your own conclusion. Make it personal to yourself.